Microbial oxygen absorber

ABSTRACT

Improved packaging and method for prolonging the shelf life and quality of packaged foods.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the fields of packaging materials, microbiology and methods for preserving food products.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A wide range of methods is used for preserving food products. Among these methods are the use of antimicrobial preservatives, e.g. chemicals such as nitrate, sulphur dioxide, benzoic acid, and proteins such as nisin and pediocin. Another method is the addition of an antioxidant such as ascorbic acid, citric acid and tocopherols. Antioxidants prevent oxidation of foods, which would otherwise result in rancidity and discoloration.

EP 0 092 183 B1 discloses a method for preservation of food by providing a culture in the food containing lactose, which generates a bacterial spoilage inhibitory substance.

WO 01/52668 discloses porphyrin-containing lactic acid bacteria and their use for reducing oxygen content in a food product.

Oxygen is a major quality-deteriorating factor with respect to many food products. Oxygen may cause growth of molds and development of rancid off-flavors, which subsequently reduce the quality and shelf life of many food products. It is therefore desirable to reduce the oxygen content in the air having contact with the food product within the packaging. Packaging in modified atmospheres with low residual oxygen has been introduced in order to reduce the quality changes associated with the presence of oxygen.

Presently the residual oxygen level in packaged foods may be reduced by means of the following approaches:

-   -   Repeating vacuum and gas flushing cycles to reduce the residual         oxygen content. This method is expensive both with respect to         amounts of gas used and time used for the gas flushing cycles.         Hence, significant increases in packaging costs result.     -   Use of a chemical oxygen absorber. The present systems utilize         one or more of the following concepts: iron powder oxidation,         ascorbic acid oxidation, photosensitive dye oxidation, enzymatic         oxidation (e.g. glucose oxidase and alcohol oxidase),         unsaturated fatty acids (e.g. oleic acid or linolenic acid), or         immobilized yeast on a solid material (Vermeiren et al., 1999,         2003). Most of the currently commercially available chemical         oxygen absorbers are based on iron powder oxidation.         Additionally, enzymatic removal of oxygen has been proposed as a         promising technique (Vermeiren et al., 1999, 2003). The oxygen         absorbing materials are incorporated into labels, sachets, or         into the packaging material. The disadvantages of these systems         are that the absorber efficiency is often low and the time used         before the system is activated is unacceptably long.         Furthermore, legislative aspects in relation to food products in         some cases hinder the use of these systems.

Food products packaged in vacuum or with a modified atmosphere are susceptible to packaging defects, and oxygen enters the packaging on opening of the package during use. Furthermore, obtaining low residual oxygen content in the packaging process is time-consuming and costly.

Thus, there is a need within the food industry to find alternative or supplementary ways of reducing the residual oxygen content in packaged foods. Such alternative ways of reducing residual oxygen content must comply with food regulatory legislation as well as with consumer preferences.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, the present invention provides a method for preservation of a food product by packaging said food in a packaging material together with a microbial oxygen absorber.

Thus, in one aspect the invention is related to a food product packaged in a packaging material together with a microbial oxygen absorber.

The present invention also provides growth media containing microorganisms capable of reducing the oxygen content in the package. The microbial oxygen absorber is preferably microorganisms consuming oxygen with little or no concomitant production of carbon dioxide and organic acids. An example of such a microorganism is a Lactococcus lactis strain, which uses oxygen and produces limited amounts of diacetyl and acetoin.

In a preferred embodiment of the invention the microbial oxygen absorber is applied to the surface of the food. In another preferred embodiment of the invention the microbial oxygen absorber is applied to a sachet, label, capsule, or as freeze-dried pellets placed within the package in a way to minimize transfer of said microbial oxygen absorber onto said food. In another embodiment the microbial oxygen absorber is incorporated into the packaging material, e.g. in a laminated structure or a coating. In another aspect the present invention provides a food product, which has a low content of oxygen within the packaging even after the consumer has repeatedly opened the packaging.

One advantage of the present invention is that increased packaging machine speed can be used because the residual oxygen at the time of packaging can be increased. Another advantage is that the oxygen content within the food packaging can be repeatedly decreased after opening and closing the packaging.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 a is a schematic illustration of the incorporation of a microbial oxygen absorber into a packaging material for food,

FIG. 1 b is a schematic illustration of the microbial oxygen absorber being sprayed on the surface of the packaging material facing the food,

FIG. 1 c shows an alternative application of a microbial oxygen absorber according to the invention,

FIG. 2 shows the measured oxygen content in samples stored 0-20 days at 9° C. Dotted lines with white dots are samples without the microbial oxygen absorber. Solid lines with black dots are samples with the microbial oxygen absorber. Triple determinations. Consecutive measurements were performed on the same package throughout the experiment, and

FIG. 3 shows measured oxygen content in samples stored 0-20 days at 20° C. Dotted lines with white dots are samples without the microbial oxygen absorber. Solid lines with black dots are samples with the microbial oxygen absorber. Triple determinations. Consecutive measurements were performed on the same package throughout the experiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 1 a shows a perishable food product 10 stored within a packaging 20 comprising a shaped upper part 22 formed from a layered material 22′ and having a foil 28 bonded to a peripheral rim 26 thereof. As shown, a tray-like bottom part 27 may be snapped on to the rim 26.

The layered material 22′ of the upper part 22 may comprise three layers 23, 24, 25, with an upper or outer layer 23 defining a barrier adapted to prevent in a conventional manner entry into the packaging 20 of air that would lead to a rapid decay of the food product 10 and thus reduce the period in which the product 10 will remain fresh prior to opening of the packaging 20 by removal of the foil 28. The central or inner layer 24 of layered material 22′ is defined by or includes a microbiological oxygen absorbing material to be discussed in closer details below. A further layer 25 defines a surface of the packaging 20 facing the food product 10, and layer 25 is permeable to allow gas communication between layer 24 and the inside of packaging 20.

Preferably, the material for the upper layer 23 and for the foil 28 comprises a PE layer to ensure sealing. The permeable layer 25 is preferably made from a perforated PE web. It is noted, however, that the packaging 20 may be made from glass or a metal, with the microbial oxygen absorber layer 24 applied on the inwardly facing surface thereof. The foil 28 may also be defined by a layered material having properties identical or similar to layered material 22′. In one embodiment, the packaging oxygen absorber is provided.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1 a, the upper part 22 is made to retain a shape where a relatively large headspace 15 is defined between the food product 10 and the upper part 22; the upper part 22 may, however, be shaped such that the food product 10 fits tightly therein.

It is noted that the layered material 22′ with the microbial oxygen absorber is preferably manufactured well in advance of the making of the packaging 20; however, in some cases, such as when the lifetime or activity of the microbiological oxygen absorbing material layer 24 is short or critical, it may be preferred to make the layered material 22′ immediately prior to the time when the packaging 20 is sealed by the foil 28, thereby reducing the period of time where the material layer 24 is exposed to atmospheric air.

The layered material 22′ may alternatively be formed without the permeable layer 25 where no protection or control of the activity of the microbiological oxygen absorbing layer 24 is required. FIG. 1 b shows one such example where layered material 22′ comprises an upper layer 23 as described above and carrying a layer of a microbial oxygen absorber sprayed or otherwise applied to the layer 23. Such a layered material 22′ for the upper part 22 may be manufactured right before the upper part 22 is shaped such as by injection moulding or deep-drawing.

In the above, the packaging 20 has been described above as providing a well-defined headspace 15 by the packaging 20 including a part 22 adapted to retain its shape under normal use. However, the use of a flexible packaging material including a microbiological oxygen absorbing material and wrapped around the food product 10 also falls within the general concept of the present invention.

FIG. 1 c shows an alternative embodiment of the invention where a layer 24 of a microbiological oxygen absorbing material has been applied to the surface of the food product 10, the packaging 20 being made from any conventional gas-impermeable material adapted to prevent entry of air into the packaging 20. The microbial oxygen absorbing material may be applied by spraying a slurry thereof onto the food product 10 before or during packaging. Optionally the slurry may comprise one or more nutrients for the microbial oxygen absorber, e.g. a carbon and/or nitrogen-source. When the food is a cheese, the application of the microbial oxygen absorber onto the cheese may be followed by the application on the food product 10 of a semi air-impermeable coating, e.g. Dutch plastic coating, paraffin wax or other lipid-based coatings.

In yet another preferred embodiment (not shown) the microbial oxygen absorber may be applied to a separate sachet or label placed within packaging 20 of FIG. 1 c, or the microbial oxygen absorber, preferably as freeze-dried powder pellets, may be introduced into the packaging 20 before sealing thereof. When in liquid form, the microbial oxygen absorber may be injected into the packaging 20 by perforating the packaging 20 and then resealing.

Food products 10 packaged according to conventional methods often perish rapidly due to oxygen present within the packaging, i.e. either in a headspace between the packaging and the food product or within the food product itself. Although the food products may be packaged in a vacuum or in a modified atmosphere, obtaining highly reduced low residual oxygen content in the packaging process is time-consuming and costly.

The use of a microbial oxygen absorber material as mentioned above allows for a reduction of the residual oxygen content by the microbial oxygen absorber ensuring that the oxygen concentration within the packaging 20 continuously decreases, preferably until depletion, following closure of the packaging 20. The invention is useful when the food product 10 is packaged in a vacuum or in a modified atmosphere and even when the food product 10 is packaged in atmospheric air.

In addition, a prolonged lifetime of the food product 10 may be ensured through the effect of the microbial oxygen absorber material after opening of the packaging 20 by the consumer where access of atmospheric air to the interior of the packaging is no longer restricted.

It is noted that, irrespectively of the packaging 20 selected for the food product 10, the microbial oxygen absorber discussed herein may be incorporated into the food product itself during the production process of the food product, for the purpose of providing a prolonged lifetime of the food product, thus allowing for the use of any conventional packaging.

The microbial oxygen absorber is preferably selected from microorganisms classified as GRAS microorganisms (Generally Recognised As Safe). Among microorganisms classified as GRAS are Lactococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Lactobacillus spp., Leucnostoc spp., Brevibacterium spp., Propionibacterium spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Saccharomyces spp., and Kluyveromyces spp.

Many microorganisms use oxygen during their metabolism. Some, however, produce acids, alcohols, gases, and flavor compounds during this process, which may cause undesirable sensory and physical changes in the foods. In one embodiment of the invention the microbial oxygen absorber uses oxygen without subsequently reducing pH or producing significant amounts of gases. In another embodiment the microbial oxygen absorber is a microorganism that also produces a change in the flavour of the food product. This change of flavour of the food product may be desirable for some applications, e.g. in relation to some dairy products.

In another embodiment of the invention the microbial oxygen absorber is selected from oxygen absorbing strains of Lactococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Lactobacillus spp., Leucnostoc spp., Brevibacterium spp., Propionibacterium spp., Bifidobacterium spp. and yeast spp. In their natural form these species may not absorb oxygen fast enough and at low concentrations of oxygen as desired when using them as microbial oxygen absorbers according to the present invention. The oxygen consumption rate of microorganisms may be improved by changing the microorganisms by either cultural modifications, modification by introducing mutations or by other genetic modifications.

The first option is to manufacture the microorganisms under conditions where they acquire or improve their ability to absorb (metabolize) oxygen. One way to accomplish this is to manufacture the microorganisms in a medium containing porphyrin, e.g. as haemin. Microorganisms may in this way be ‘loaded’ with a porphyrin compound, allowing microorganisms which do not naturally contain porphyrin compounds or which contain insufficient porphyrin compounds, e.g. Lactococus, to absorb oxygen. Reference is made to WO 01/52668 wherein a strain of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis (DSM 12015) was cultured in a medium containing haemin, thus resulting in bacteria containing at least 0.1 ppm on a dry matter basis of a porphyrin compound.

Another option for modifying a microorganism such as a lactic acid bacterium, is to introduce one or more mutations causing a shift in the metabolism such that the oxygen absorption by metabolism is increased. In one embodiment a lactic acid bacterium is Ldh defective, Ldh⁻, i.e. a mutation has been introduced which causes a defective lactate dehydrogene activity. Ldh⁻ strains cannot regenerate NAD⁺ from NADH by reducing pyruvate to lactic acid, and these strains must rely on other reactions for regenerating NAD⁺, e.g. NADH oxidase encoded by the nox gene. Regeneration of NAD+ by NADH oxidase causes the concomitant consumption of oxygen. Thus, in yet another embodiment the microbial oxygen absorber is a lactic acid bacterium having Ldh⁻ phenotype and overexpressing NADH oxidase. In yet another embodiment, the microbial oxygen absorber is a lactic acid bacterium having Ldh⁻ and Pfl⁻ phenotype, i.e. being defective in both lactate dehydrogenase and in pyruvate formate lyase activities. Methods for producing such Ldh⁻ strains are disclosed in WO 98/54337, EP 0937774 and EP 0928333. These documents also disclose assays suitable for quantification of the oxygen consumption rate by these microorganism. Typically, a liquid such as skimmed milk at 30° C. is inoculated with an appropriate amount of microorganisms, e.g. 10⁷ CFU/mL, and the oxygen concentration in the liquid is measured over time.

In yet another embodiment the microbial oxygen absorber is Lactococcus lactis. In yet another embodiment the microbial oxygen absorber is a Lactococcus lactis, which consumes oxygen and does not produce lactic acid. In yet another embodiment the microbial oxygen absorber is a Lactococcus lactis strain which is Ldh⁻, e.g. DN-224 (DSM 11037). In yet another embodiment the microbial oxygen absorber is a Lactococcus lactis strain which is Ldh⁻ and Pfl⁻, e.g. DN-223 (DSM 11036). In yet another embodiment the microbial oxygen absorber is a Lactococcus lactis strain which is Ldh⁻ and overexpresses NADH oxidase.

In other embodiments the microbial oxygen absorber does not produce significant amounts of organic acids and carbon dioxide. In yet another embodiment the microbial oxygen absorber is Lactococcus lactis subsp. diacetylactis. In yet another embodiment the microbial oxygen absorber is Lactococcus lactis subsp. diacetylactis strain which is Ldh⁻. In yet another embodiment the microbial oxygen absorber is a Lactococcus lactis subsp. diacetylactis which is Ldh⁻ and Pfl⁻. In yet another embodiment the microbial oxygen absorber is a Lactococcus lactis subsp. diacetylactis strain which is Ldh⁻ and overexpresses NADH oxidase.

In another embodiment of the invention the microbial oxygen absorber is able to lower the concentration of oxygen in skimmed milk at 30° C. from about 8 mg/kg to less than 1 mg/kg in less than 3 hours after inoculating the skimmed milk with 10⁶ CFU/mL of the microbial oxygen absorber.

In another embodiment of the invention the microbial oxygen absorber is able to lower the concentration of oxygen in a solution of 0.1% peptone, 0.85% NaCl and 3% lactose at 30° C. from about 8 mg/kg to less than 1 mg/kg in less than 3 hours after inoculating the skimmed milk with 10⁶ CFU/mL of the microbial oxygen absorber.

A wide variety of food products may be preserved according to the present invention. Dairy products, such as cheese, are particularly preferred. In one embodiment of the invention the food product is selected from the group consisting of a sliced meat product, a ready meal incl. a sous-vide product, or a bakery product.

The present invention is further illustrated by the following examples, which, however, are not to be construed as limiting the scope of protection. The features disclosed in the foregoing description and in the following examples may, both separately or in any combination thereof, be material for realising the invention in diverse forms thereof.

REFERENCES

L. Vermeiren, F. Deviieghere, M. van Best, N de Kruijf, J. Debevere. 1999. Developments in the active packaging of foods. Trends in Food Science & Technology 10: 77-86.

L. Vermeiren, F. Heirlings, F. Devlieghere, J. Debevere. 2003. Oxygen, ethylene and other scavengers. In: R. Ahvenainen (Ed.) Novel Food Packaging Techniques. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp.22-49.

EXAMPLES Example 1

The aim was to evaluate the effect of the microbial oxygen absorber on low-fat and high-fat cheeses.

The microbial oxygen absorber Lactococcus lactis was obtained from Chr. Hansen (F-DVS DN-224, deposited under accession number DSM 11037). The following growth media containing lactose and protease peptone were produced:

0.25% Lactose:

-   1.0 g peptone -   8.5 g NaCl -   2.5 g lactose -   1000 mL demineralized water     0.50% Lactose: -   1.0 g peptone -   8.5 g NaCl -   5.0 g lactose -   1000 mL demineralized water     0.75% Lactose: -   1.0 g peptone -   8.5 g NaCl -   7.5 g lactose -   1000 mL demineralized water

The growth media were autoclaved, cooled to 30° C., and 100 g of F-DVS DN-224 was added. This gave a 10⁸ cfu/mL concentration of bacteria.

Two types of cheese were evaluated: A low-fat semi-hard cheese (5% fat in dry matter) and a high-fat semi-hard cheese (60% fat in dry matter). The products were sliced, and the surface sprayed with the bacteria slurry. The cheeses were subsequently packaged in a commercial packaging made of APETIPE and with a lid consisting of OPA/PE. A modified atmosphere containing 30-33% CO₂ and max 0.5% O₂, and with N₂ as fill gas was used. The products were stored at 5° C. in the dark until time of sampling.

The products were evaluated after 9, 11, 13 and 15 weeks for the low-fat cheese and after 15, 17, 19, and 21 weeks with respect to the high-fat cheese. The following evaluations were performed: Gas content (O₂ and CO₂) and sensory evaluations. Furthermore, pH, peptide mapping, and volatile aroma compounds were evaluated after 13 and 15 weeks for low-fat cheese and after 19 and 21 weeks with respect to high-fat cheese.

The results are listed in Table 1. For clarity, only results after 13 and 15 weeks for low-fat cheeses and results after 19 and 21 weeks with respect to the high-fat cheese are listed. The entire test battery was applied at these times of withdrawal. TABLE 1 Effect of the use of a microbial oxygen absorber on physical, chemical, and sensory properties of semi-hard low-fat and high-fat cheeses. Microbial Storage O₂ CO₂ Diacetyl Product O₂ absorber time (weeks) (Note 1) (Note 1) pH “ppm” Peptide mapping Sensory evaluations Low-fat − 13 0.021 20.2 5.60 0.457 Differences in peptide profiles of Flavor and odor were improved when cheese + 13 0.013 20.3 5.53 0.625 13 and 15 weeks cheeses are using the microbial O₂ absorber noted − 15 0.019 20.2 5.53 0.556 No differences In peptide profiles Flavor and odor were improved when + 15 0.005 21.4 5.53 0.727 of products with and without using the microbial O₂ absorber microbial absorber were found High-fat − 19 0.050 17.2 5.13 1.039 Difference in peptide profiles of Flavor was improved when using the cheese + 19 0.020 20.7 5.19 0.945 19 and 21 weeks cheeses were microbial O₂ absorber in combination noted with high lactose concentrations. No Slight differences in profiles of explicit differences In odor was noted − 21 0.040 19.1 5.10 0.674 products with and without Odor was improved when using the + 21 0.029 19.0 5.11 0.952 microbial absorber were noted microbial O₂ absorber. No pronounced differences In flavor were noted (Note 1): Only 0.75% lactose results. Same trend was noted for the two other lactose concentrations.

No effect of the microbial oxygen absorber on pH was noted in either low-fat cheese or high-fat cheeses. The absorber may have a slight effect on the ripening of high-fat cheeses. Increased levels of diacetyl and acetoin (exemplified by diacetyl in Table 1) were noted in the cheeses. These compounds have a positive effect on the flavor of dairy products. Simple sensory evaluations revealed a positive effect of the microbial oxygen absorber.

Example 2

The aim was to evaluate the effect of the microbial oxygen absorber at different residual oxygen levels.

The microbial oxygen absorber Lactococcus lactis was obtained from Chr. Hansen (F-DVS DN-224). The following growth medium containing lactose and protease peptone was produced:

3% Lactose:

-   1.0 g peptone -   8.5 g NaCl -   30 g lactose -   1000 mL demineralized water

The growth medium was autoclaved, cooled to 20° C., and 10 g of F-DVS DN-224 was added. This gave a 47×10⁷ cfu/mL concentration of bacteria. A reference containing only the peptone solution was used for comparison. 40 mL 3% lactose/peptone water or peptone water with/without the microbial oxygen absorber were placed in a tray consisting of APET/PE and with a lid consisting of OPA/PE. Three packaging gas combinations were applied targeting at the following residual oxygen concentrations: 0.3%, 1%, and 21% (atmospheric air). CO₂ was constant at approx. 25% for the reduced oxygen gases and approx. 0% for the atmospheric air. N₂ was used as a fill gas.

The packages were stored at 9° C. and 20° C. for 0, 7, 12, and 20 days.

At time of sampling, gas content (O₂ and CO₂) and growth of Lactococcus lactis (M17 agar) were measured. Lactose content and pH were measured at the beginning and end of the experiment. Consecutive measurements were performed on the same package throughout the experiment. The results were averaged and based on triplicate determinations. The results of the oxygen measurements are listed in FIG. 2 and 3.

The microbial oxygen absorber reduced the oxygen level compared to a control without the microbial oxygen absorber. This effect was noted both at 9° C. and 20° C.

Example 3

Product tests with the microbial oxygen absorber and Cheddar cheese have been performed.

The aim was to evaluate the effect of the microbial oxygen absorber at different residual oxygen levels, and with and without inoculation of Penicillium camemberti.

The microbial oxygen absorber Lactococcus lactis was obtained from Chr. Hansen (F-DVS DN-224). The following growth medium containing lactose and protease peptone was produced:

3% Lactose:

-   1.0 g peptone -   8.5 g NaCl -   30 g lactose -   1000 mL demineralized water

The growth medium was autoclaved, cooled to 20° C., and 0.5 g of F-DVS DN-224 was added. This gave a 27×10⁶ cfu/mL concentration of bacteria. A reference containing only the lactose/peptone solution was used for comparison.

The Penicillium camemberti strain was located at Kvibille Dairy and grown on DYES (dichloran yeast extract sucrose) agar. The spores were resuspended in sterilized water to obtain a 10⁶ spores/mL solution. The Penicillium camemberti solution had a concentration of 12×10⁵ spores/mL.

40 mL 3% lactose/peptone water with/without the microbial oxygen absorber were placed in a tray consisting of APET/PE and with a lid consisting of OPANPE. Cheddar chunks weighing approx. 100 g were dipped in paraffin and dried. The Cheddar was placed in the tray, and half of the samples were inoculated with 10 μl of the Penicillium camemberti suspension.

Three packaging gas combinations were applied targeting at the following residual oxygen concentrations: 0.3%, 1%, and 21% (atmospheric air). CO₂ was constant at approx 25% for the reduced oxygen gases and approx. 0% for the atmospheric air. N₂ was used as a fill gas.

The packages were stored at 9° C. and 20° C. for 0, 5, 10, and 20 days.

At time of sampling, gas content (O₂ and CO₂) and growth of Lactococcus lactis (M17 agar) were measured. Lactose content and pH were measured at the beginning and end of the experiment. Consecutive measurements were performed on the same package throughout the experiment. The results were averaged and based on duplicate determinations.

In samples only containing the microbial oxygen absorber, i.e. without the Penicillium camemberti inoculation, a clear effect of the presence of the absorber on the residual oxygen content was noted. When comparing the samples with both the microbial absorber and Penicillium camemberti, it appeared that the mold apparently used the oxygen present and that the oxygen levels were significantly reduced in the products containing both the microbial oxygen absorber and the Penicillium camemberti as compared to samples only containing the microbial oxygen absorber.

Example 4

The aim of the experiment is to evaluate the effect of the microbial absorber on quality changes caused by light exposure.

Different residual oxygen levels are tested (between 0-5%). The cheeses are packaged in commercial packaging materials, the microbial oxygen absorber is sprayed on the cheese surfaces, and subsequently, the cheeses are packaged in modified atmospheres and stored at chilled temperatures in the dark or exposed to light (resembling retail exposure conditions). At time of withdrawal, gas content (O₂ and CO₂) is evaluated, and relevant physico-chemical, microbial, and sensory evaluations are carried out.

Example 5

The aim of the experiment is to optimize the microbial oxygen absorber system.

The following parameters are evaluated:

-   -   Different growth substrates (milk, peptone water, milk         hydrolysates, and water).     -   Different growth temperatures (5° C., 9° C., and 20° C.)     -   Optimal concentration of microbial absorber material         (inoculation percentage)     -   Method of application.

Example 6

The aim of the experiment is to evaluate the optimal combination of microbial oxygen absorber concentration and residual oxygen content, which may subsequently result in increasing packaging machine speeds. The experiment involves spraying techniques and evaluations of different oxygen concentrations. (e.g. 0.1, 0.3, 1, and 5% O₂). Finally, up scaling experiments with different dairy products take place. Other food products are also included in the evaluations.

Example 7

Delite 5% sliced cheese is placed in plastic trays and Lactococcus lactis subsp lactis DN224 in a lactose/peptone solution is sprayed onto the cheese.

The plastic trays are packaged with a gas having the following composition: 0.4% O₂ og 43.5% CO₂.

The O₂ and CO₂ concentrations in the head space of the packaged cheese are measured after packaging as well as after the experiment.

The following materials are used:

-   -   Nr. Vium trays (GL440, 400 mu APET/40 mu PE) and lids (15 mu         OPA/40 mu PE)     -   Delite 5% sliced cheese from Nr. Vium dairy.

Gas composition used for packaging: 43.5% carbon dioxide nd 04% oxygen.

The lactose/peptione solution contains: NaCl 8.5 g Peptone 1.0 g Lactose 30.0 g Water 1 Litre Autoclaved at 121° C. for 45 minutes

The cheese is inoculated with the following amount of Lactococcus lactic DN-224:

-   -   10 g frozen Lc. lactis culture is added per litre of         lactose/peptone solution. Each cheese for packaging in a plastic         tray is added 1 mL of the lactose/peptone by spraying.

The plastic trays are packaged (sealed) using a Multivac T200 from Multivac.

The packaged cheeses are incubated at 20° C. and at 9° C.

The following packaged cheese products are prepared:

-   -   1. 9 trays with cheese, Lc. lactis and lactose/peptone solution.     -   2. 9 trays with cheese and lactose/peptone solution     -   3. 9 trays with cheese and sterile water.     -   4. 9 trays with Lc. Lactis and lactose/peptone solution.     -   5. 9 trays with lactose/peptone solution. 

1. Food product packaged in a packaging material together with a microbial oxygen absorber.
 2. The food product according to claim 1, wherein any gas within the packaging has a reduced or equal content of oxygen as compared to atmospheric air, such as less than 1% oxygen, less than 0.05% oxygen or less than 0.01% oxygen.
 3. The food product according to any one of claims 1-2, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is bacteria.
 4. The food product according to anyone of claims 1-3, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is selected from oxygen absorbing strains of Lactococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Lactobacillus spp., Leuconostoc spp., Brevibacterium spp., Propionibacterium spp., Bifidobacterium spp, and yeast spp.
 5. The food product according to any one of claims 1-4, wherein the microbial oxygen absorber is Lactococcus lactis.
 6. The food product according to claim 5, wherein said Lactococcus lactis consumes oxygen and does not produce lactic acid.
 7. The food product according to any one of claims 1-6, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber does not produce significant amounts of organic acids and carbon dioxide.
 8. The food product according to any one of claims 1-7, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is a strain having the phenotype Ldh⁻, e.g. Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis DN-224 deposited as DSM
 11037. 9. The food product according to claim 8, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is a strain having the phenotype Pfl⁻, e.g. Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis DN-223 deposited as DSM
 11036. 10. The food product according to any one of claims 1-8, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is a strain which overexpresses NADH oxidase, e.g. a strain of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis.
 11. The food product according to any one of claims 1-10, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is a lactic acid bacterium which has been cultured in the presence of at least one porphyrin compound.
 12. The food product according to any one of claim 1-11, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is Lactococcus lactis subsp. diacetylactis.
 13. The food product according to any of the preceding claims, said packaging material being wrapped around said food product.
 14. The food product according to any of the preceding claims, the packaging including a space between said packaging material and the food product.
 15. The food product according to claim 14, wherein the volume of said head space is from 10 mL to 200 mL, and the weight of said food product is from 100 grams to 1000 grams, and the amount of microbial oxygen absorber applied to said food product is from 10³ to 10⁹ CFU.
 16. The food product according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is applied to the surface of the food.
 17. The food product according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is incorporated into the food product.
 18. The food product according to claim any one of claims 1-10, wherein said packaging material is a coating, e.g. Dutch plastic coating, paraffin wax, or other lipid-based coatings, applied directly onto the surface of the food product with said microbial oxygen absorber between said food product and said coating, or with said microbial oxygen absorber incorporated in said coating.
 19. The food product according to claim 14, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is applied to a sachet, label, capsule, or as freeze-dried powder pellets placed within said space.
 20. The food product according to any of the preceding claims, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is arranged on a surface of said packaging material facing said food product.
 21. The food product according to any one of claims 1-20, which is a solid food product.
 22. The food product according to any one of claims 1-21, which is a dairy product.
 23. The food product according to claim 22, which is a fermented food product, such as cheese.
 24. The food product according to any one of claims 1-21, which is selected from the group consisting of a sliced meat product, a ready meal incl. a sous-vide product, and a bakery product.
 25. The food product according to any one of the preceding claims, packaged in a modified atmosphere.
 26. The food product according to any one of the preceding claims, packaged in atmospheric air.
 27. The food product according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the amount of the food product within said packaging is in the range from 100 grams to 1000 grams, such as from 100 grams to 700 grams, or from 200 grams to 500 grams, and wherein the amount of microbial oxygen absorber which is added to said food product during manufacturing is from 10³ to 10¹⁰ CFU.
 28. A method for the preservation of a food product by packaging said food in a packaging material, preferably a material defining a barrier adapted to prevent or to minimize in a conventional manner entry into the packaging of air, together with a microbial oxygen absorber.
 29. The method according to the preceding claim, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is applied to the surface of said food or incorporated in said packaging material.
 30. The method according to claim 29 wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is applied in an amount from 10² CFU/cm² to 10⁷ CFU/cm², such as from 10³ CFU/cm² to 10⁶ CFU/cm², or from 10⁴ CFU/cm² to 10⁵ CFU/cm².
 31. The method according to the preceding claim, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is applied by spraying a slurry containing said microbial oxygen absorber onto the food product or onto said packaging material, said slurry optionally comprising one or more nutrients for the microbial oxygen absorber, e.g. a carbon and/or nitrogen-source.
 32. The method according to claim 28, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is applied to a sachet, label, capsule, or as freeze-dried powder pellets placed in a space between said food product and said packaging material.
 33. Sachet, label, capsule, or freeze-dried powder pellets comprising a microbial oxygen absorber and necessary substrates for the microbial oxygen absorber to assimilate oxygen upon exposure to water vapour.
 34. A packaging for food, comprising a packaging material and a microbial oxygen absorber.
 35. The packaging according to claim 34, said microbial oxygen absorber being ap plied, such as by a spraying operation, on a surface of said packaging material adapted to face a food storage compartment of said packaging.
 36. The packaging according to any of claims 34-35, wherein said packaging material comprises at least two layers, one defining a barrier and another layer comprising said microbial oxygen absorber.
 37. The packaging according to any of the preceding claims, said packaging material comprising a gas-permeable layer, said layer comprising said microbial oxygen absorber being arranged between said barrier and said gas-permeable layer.
 38. The packaging according to any of claims 34-37, said packaging material being shaped, such as by injection moulding or deep-drawing.
 39. The packaging according to any of claims 34-38, said packaging material being flexible.
 40. The packaging material according to claim 37, said gas-impermeable layer being glass or metal.
 41. The packaging or packaging material according to any of claims 34-40, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is selected from oxygen absorbing strains of Lactococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Lactobacillus spp., Leuconostoc spp., Brevibacterium spp., Propionibacterium spp., Bifidobacterium spp, and yeast spp.
 42. The packaging according to any one of claims 3441, wherein the microbial oxygen absorber is Lactococcus lactis.
 43. The packaging according to any of the preceding claims, wherein said Lactococcus lactis consumes oxygen and does not produce lactic acid.
 44. The packaging according to any one of claims 34-43, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber does not produce significant amounts of organic acids and carbon dioxide.
 45. The packaging material according to any one of claims 34-44, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is a strain having the phenotype Ldh⁻, e.g. Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis DN-224 deposited as DSM
 11037. 46. The packaging material according to claim 45, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is a strain having the phenotype Pfl⁻, e.g. of Lactdcoccus lactis subsp. lactis DN-223 deposited as DSM
 11036. 47. The packaging material according to any one of claims 34-46, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is a strain which overexpresses NADH oxidase, e.g. a strain of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis.
 48. The packaging material according to any one of claims 34-47, wherein said microbial oxygen absorber is a lactic acid bacterium which has been cultured in the presence of at least one porphyrin compound.
 49. The packaging material according to any one of claims 34-44, wherein said microbial oxygen,absorber is Lactococcus lactis subsp. diacetylactis. 